Every system sees a valid event.
The threat sits in the combination.

Your badge system, directory, OT console and SIEM can each report nothing wrong while a threat moves between them. Orphean is the intelligence layer across your entire security estate. It joins what each tool sees around the person, site or asset that matters.

Identify threats quicker

Joins physical, cyber, and identity events into one situation.

Assign risk

Scores each person, asset and site, with the reasons shown.

Respond faster

One explained case, sent to the person accountable.

And prove it

Every finding and decision kept as an audit-ready record.

Security estates have grown faster than anyone's ability to see across them

Three things we keep hearing from security leaders in energy, mining, engineering, venues and financial services.

“We have plenty of data. Tell me what I would do differently with it.”

More domains

Cyber, OT and physical security run apart, often site by site or by supplier. Each works. None sees the whole picture.

More access

Staff, contractors, suppliers, service accounts and now AI agents all hold access at once. Access is granted properly, then outlives its purpose.

More noise

Every tool raises its own alerts. Teams spend their time reconciling evidence across consoles instead of deciding what to do.

The incidents that matter rarely trip an alarm

They show up only when the steps are connected. Orphean connects them, then sends one explained case to the person who can act.

Learn more

Keep your SIEM. Keep your IAM. Orphean adds what none of them see alone.

SIEM and XDR

The context it never holds

Badge, guarding, OT, rosters and ownership, organised around the entity.

IAM, IGA and PAM

Whether access still has a purpose

Your tools grant access. Orphean shows when it has outlived its reason.

PSIM, access control, CCTV

Presence linked to activity

What the same person did digitally before and after they arrived on site.

Is this just another SIEM? Read the answer

Hybrid threats don't respect security boundaries

Each step can look legitimate on its own. The ones that matter are those no single team can see whole. Neither should your intelligence stop at a boundary.

Identity misuse

Valid credentials used for an invalid purpose, across identity and OT systems.

Insider threats

Out-of-hours entry, then privileged access, then an unusual report.

Suppliers and contractors

The engagement has ended. The access on site and in systems has not.

AI agents Roadmap

Agents act with delegated access, and some act beyond their authority.

Blended attacks

A physical incident draws attention while a digital attack proceeds.

OT and critical assets

A valid login and an unapproved change on a controller at a critical site.

Two applications of the same platform, built with Development Partners

And it runs on your premises, inside your boundary, so sensitive and CNI data stays where it must.

In development

Identity Assurance

Is this person, contractor, service account or AI agent still supposed to have access?

In development

Venue Assurance

When thousands of people converge, who sees the whole event?

Start with one question

Which site, asset or group of people creates the most uncertainty for you today? We'll take that question, the three or four systems that hold the evidence, and prove the answer on your own data.